Westland Oil Development Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Supreme Court of Texas
637 S.W.2d 903 (Tex. 1982)
Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil) owned oil and gas leases on several sections of the Rojo Caballos Field. Mobil signed a farmout agreement with Westland Oil Development Corporation (Westland) (plaintiff). In a subsequent letter agreement, Westland assigned its obligations under the farmout agreement to Chambers & Kennedy (C & K). The letter agreement between Westland and C & K contained an area of mutual interest agreement, under which the parties agreed that they and their assigns would share any leases either party acquired on “any of the lands covered by said farmout agreement.” Pursuant to the farmout agreement, C & K drilled a producing well and Mobil assigned to C & K part of Mobil’s interests in the leasehold. The Mobile-to-C & K assignment stated that it would be subject to an operating agreement the parties had signed seven days earlier. The operating agreement stated that in the event of any conflict between it and the original farmout agreement between Mobil and Westland or the letter agreement between Westland and C & K, those prior agreements would prevail. Subsequently, Mobil entered into a separate farmout agreement with Bernard Hanson which included the land at issue. This farmout agreement stated that some of the land and leases included in the agreement were subject to the operating agreement between Mobil and C & K, meaning that any interest Hanson earned from Mobil would be subject to that operating agreement. Hanson assigned the farmout agreement to Gulf Oil Corporation (Gulf) (defendant). Gulf drilled a producing well and was assigned certain interests from Mobil as a result. At this point, Westland brought suit against Gulf, seeking a declaratory judgment that the letter agreement—and area of mutual interest agreement therein—was valid and applied to these assignments from Mobil to Gulf. Gulf argued that it did not have notice of the letter agreement. The trial court granted Westland summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed. Westland appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McGee, J.)
Dissent (Wallace, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.