Wetherell v. Douglas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
230 P.3d 976 (2010)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
Garden Valley Estates, LLC (Garden Valley) (plaintiff) brought suit challenging an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) (defendant). LUBA’s order held that a 259-acre parcel of land (Property) owned by Garden Valley that was not used for ranching or grazing, but that had been part of a 590-acre livestock ranch prior to partition and purchase by Garden Valley in 2005, was a “farm unit” under Oregon law and was therefore subject to regulations meant to preserve agricultural land for agricultural use. Garden Valley argued that the Property could not be a farm unit because the 590 acres, including the Property, could not be profitably used for a farm-related purpose. LUBA argued, based on the text of the Oregon statute, that profitability did not involve a consideration of whether a parcel of land was intermingled with or adjacent to lands with the appropriate soil classification that were within a farm unit. Regarding that situation, as well as where the subject parcel was once jointly operated with the adjacent land as a farm, LUBA held that the relevant question was whether there was some significant obstacle to the resumption of the joint operation of the land for agricultural purposes. Because the soil, water, and forage conditions had not changed since the operation of the 590 acres as a ranch, LUBA held that there was no significant obstacle and that the 590 acres—including the Property—constituted a farm unit. The court of appeals reviewed LUBA’s order.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haselton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.