Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Whatley v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
928 N.E.2d 202 (2010)


Facts

When police arrested Walker Whatley (defendant) at his home, a search incident to the arrest revealed that Whatley was in possession of 3.2459 grams of cocaine. The offense for which Whatley was arrested was unrelated to the cocaine. The cocaine was located in a bag inside Whatley’s pocket. Whatley’s home was approximately 795 feet from Robinson Community Church (RCC), an organization that offered a number of services and programs targeted at the community’s youth. Whatley was convicted of possession of cocaine, which was a class A felony, and received a 35-year sentence. Although possession of more than three grams of cocaine was typically a class C offense, Indiana law increased the severity of the offense to a class A offense if the possession occurred within 1,000 feet of a youth program center. Whatley appealed his conviction to the court of appeals on the ground that RCC was not a youth program center. The court of appeals agreed with Whatley, finding that offering programs for youth did not change RCC’s status as a church, and therefore remanded Whatley’s case with instructions to enter the conviction as a class C felony. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Boehm, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.