White v. Mellin
United Kingdom House of Lords
[1895] A.C. 154 (1895)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
White (defendant) sold two kinds of baby food from two companies: Dr. Vance and Mellin (plaintiff). White sold Mellin’s baby food with a label that said: “Notice. The public are recommended to try Dr. Vance’s prepared for infants and invalids, it being far more nutritious and healthful than any other preparation yet offered.” Mellin filed suit against White, seeking an injunction against White from including the label on Mellin’s baby food. Mellin presented no evidence of lost profits resulting from White’s label. The trial court dismissed the case. The court of appeals ordered a new trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Herschell, J.)
Concurrence (Shand, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.