White v. Regester

412 U.S. 755 (1973)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

White v. Regester

United States Supreme Court
412 U.S. 755 (1973)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Play video

Facts

Texas (defendant) adopted a plan for redistricting the Texas House of Representatives that created multimember districts. The redistricting plan was challenged for diluting minority voting power in violation of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Two counties were highlighted: Dallas County and Bexar County. Dallas County had only elected two Black legislators from the county to the Texas House of Representatives since 1880. Additionally, the organization that effectively controlled the county’s Democratic Party had a history of campaigning against candidates who were supported by the Black community. Bexar County, which was 29 percent Mexican American, had only elected five Mexican American legislators to the Texas House of Representatives since 1880. The county had also historically discriminated against the community in areas such as healthcare, education, employment, and politics. The district court held that the multimember districts of Dallas County and Bexar County discriminated against their respective minority voter groups and ordered that they be turned into single-member districts. Texas appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership