Wi-LAN Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
992 F.3d 1366 (2021)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Wi-LAN, Inc. (plaintiff) sued Sharp Electronics Corporation (Sharp) (defendant) for patent infringement. At trial, Wi-LAN sought to introduce an unauthenticated source-code printout. The trial court excluded the source code as hearsay. Wi-LAN’s expert witness wrote a report concluding that Sharp’s television infringed Wi-LAN’s patent. The expert based his opinion on the unauthenticated source-code printout. Wi-LAN argued that under Federal Rule of Evidence 703, the source-code printout was admissible because it served as the basis for its expert’s opinion. The trial court excluded the source code and granted Sharp’s motion for summary judgment. Wi-LAN appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.




