Wi-LAN Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
992 F.3d 1366 (2021)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Wi-LAN, Inc. (plaintiff) sued Sharp Electronics Corporation (Sharp) (defendant) for patent infringement. At trial, Wi-LAN sought to introduce an unauthenticated source-code printout. The trial court excluded the source code as hearsay. Wi-LAN’s expert witness wrote a report concluding that Sharp’s television infringed Wi-LAN’s patent. The expert based his opinion on the unauthenticated source-code printout. Wi-LAN argued that under Federal Rule of Evidence 703, the source-code printout was admissible because it served as the basis for its expert’s opinion. The trial court excluded the source code and granted Sharp’s motion for summary judgment. Wi-LAN appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 943,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New




