From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Wigglesworth v. Teamsters Local Union No. 592
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
68 F.R.D. 609 (1975)
Welford Wigglesworth, Jr. (plaintiff) brought suit against Teamsters Local Union No. 592 (Teamsters) (defendant) for denial of his right to free speech at union meetings in violation of a federal statute. When he filed the complaint, Wigglesworth took part in a press conference and linked Teamsters to the Mafia and accused the organization of fixing elections. Teamsters then asserted a counterclaim against Wigglesworth for defamation. Wigglesworth filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction as there was no diversity of citizenship between the parties and federal jurisdiction for the case is based solely on the alleged violation of the federal statute.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Warriner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 608,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 608,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.