Will of Block
Surrogate’s Court, New York County
598 N.Y.S.2d 668 (1993)
The will of Dina Block, a New York resident, established a trust for the benefit of her son Paul and Paul’s two sons, Allan and John. The will gave Paul a limited power to appoint any trust principal remaining at his death between Allan and John. Allan and John’s half-brother, Cyrus, was not a permitted appointee. Paul, a resident of Ohio, executed a will that did not to refer to his power of appointment under Dina’s will, and divided his estate between Allan, John, and Cyrus. Following Paul’s death, the trustees (plaintiffs) brought an action to determine whether Paul had validly exercised his power of appointment when he disposed of his estate, even though he had not referred to the power of appointment, and had exercised the power in partial violation of the limitation on the power of appointment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Preminger, S.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.