United States Supreme Court
546 U.S. 345 (2005)
Federal authorities seized Susan Hallock’s (plaintiff) computer equipment, software, and disk drives pursuant to a warrant. In the process, several disk drives were ruined and all of Hallock’s stored data, including trade secrets and account files for her business, was lost, forcing Hallock out of business. Hallock brought suit against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), claiming negligence on the part of the federal authorities that seized her property. While that suit was still pending, Hallock filed a separate suit against Will, et al., the individual federal agents (defendants). The district court dismissed Hallock’s FTCA suit, finding an exception to the waiver of sovereign immunity. The defendants then moved for judgment in this suit, citing the judgment bar in the FTCA, which stated that any judgment on an FTCA claim based on sovereign immunity was a complete bar to any action coming about under the same subject matter against the government employees whose conduct gave rise to the FTCA claim. The district court denied the defendants’ motion, refusing to apply the judgment bar because the dismissal of Hallock’s FTCA claim was on procedural grounds. The defendants appealed and the court of appeals agreed to hear the appeal under the collateral order doctrine. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals had the jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.