Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Williams v. City of Jacksonville Police Dept.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina
599 S.E.2d 422 (N.C. App. 2004)


Facts

Williams (plaintiff) was pulled over by police officers Billy Houston and Earl Burkhart (defendants). The defendants made Williams get out of the car at gunpoint and conducted a pat-down search. Williams later sued the defendants and the City of Jacksonville Police Department (department) (defendant) in state court, alleging the defendants had exceeded the scope of the stop and used excessive force. Williams asserted violations of his federal civil rights and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Williams also asserted state law claims, including negligence, false arrest, and assault against the officers, and failure to train against the department. The defendants removed the case to federal court based on the federal claim. The defendants then moved for summary judgment, which was granted on the federal claims. The district judge concluded as a matter of law that: (1) there was probable cause for the stop, (2) the defendants’ conduct was reasonable, and (3) the force used was reasonable. However, the summary judgment order specified that the district court had refused to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent state law claims and dismissed them without prejudice. Williams sued in state court, asserting only state-law claims. The defendants moved for summary judgment based on res judicata and collateral estoppel, but the motion was denied. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tyson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.