Willis v. HBO
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
57 Fed. Appx. 902 (2003) (unpublished opinion)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Patricia Willis (plaintiff) copyrighted an outline for a proposed television series, Schmoozers, about a money-driven talent agent. Home Box Office (HBO) (defendant) produced and aired a series called Arli$$, which revolved around an unscrupulous sports agent. Both characters had hapless male sidekicks and smart female assistants. However, there were significant differences, including the basic framing devices. Arli$$ used narrated readings from the main character’s autobiography, whereas Schmoozers would have had its assistant character directly address the audience. Willis brought a copyright-infringement action against HBO. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of HBO. Willis appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
