Wilson v. City of Pine Bluff

641 S.W.2d 33 (1982)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wilson v. City of Pine Bluff

Court of Appeals of Arkansas
641 S.W.2d 33 (1982)

RW

Facts

In response to a medical emergency, police officers entered a residence in the city of Pine Bluff, Arkansas (plaintiff). Inside, the officers found Joe Wilson (defendant) near a woman who told the officers she lawfully lived in the residence and wanted Wilson to leave. Wilson refused to leave, despite the woman's request and despite police warnings that Wilson must either leave the property or be arrested for criminal trespass. Wilson never made any claim to possession or ownership of the property. The police arrested Wilson for unlawfully remaining on the woman's premises, and the city prosecuted Wilson for criminal trespass. At trial, the only evidence against Wilson was the police officers' account of the incident. Wilson was convicted. On appeal to the Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Wilson argued the police testimony was inadmissible hearsay.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooper, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership