Wojitas v. Fifth Avenue Coach Corp.

23 A.D.2d 685, 257 N.Y.S.2d 404 (1965)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wojitas v. Fifth Avenue Coach Corp.

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
23 A.D.2d 685, 257 N.Y.S.2d 404 (1965)

Facts

Charles Williams (defendant) was a bus driver for Fifth Avenue Coach Corporation (Coach) (defendant). Julia Wojitas and her husband (plaintiffs) sued Coach and Williams after Julia was hit by a bus driven by Williams. The Wojitases did not introduce Williams’s deposition testimony into evidence at trial. Nevertheless, the trial court allowed Coach and Williams to read some of Williams’s deposition testimony to the jury. The trial court did so because Williams was unavailable to testify in person due to illness. The jury ruled in favor of Coach and Williams. The Wojitases appealed, arguing that the trial court should not have allowed Williams’s deposition into evidence.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership