Wolford v. Lopez
United States Supreme Court
146 S. Ct. 2032 (2026)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Hawaii had long restricted licenses to carry firearms to exceptional cases. After the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen held that the Second Amendment protected the right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense, Hawaii changed its laws. The new laws allowed residents to obtain a license but required compliance with certain restrictions. One restriction prohibited licensed persons from carrying a firearm onto another’s private property open to the public without the property owner’s express consent. The law inverted the common-law default rule, under which persons lawfully carrying firearms could enter private property open to the public unless expressly prohibited. Jason Wolford, two other Maui residents with concealed-carry permits, and an organization with licensed-to-carry members (plaintiffs) sued Hawaii attorney general Anne Lopez (defendant), arguing that the restriction was unconstitutional. Lopez countered that the restriction was constitutional because (1) Hawaii historically imposed heavy restrictions on private firearm possession and (2) colonial and early state analogues prohibited carrying firearms onto another’s property without consent. The district court deemed the restriction unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement. The Ninth Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Barrett, J.)
Dissent (Kagan, J.)
Dissent (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 950,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New


