United States Supreme Court
339 U.S. 33 (1950)
Wong Yang Sung (plaintiff), a Chinese national, was arrested for unlawfully being in the United States. The Immigration and Nationalization Service (INS) (defendant) held a hearing, and the immigration inspector recommended that Wong be deported. The INS approved the recommendation. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed. Wong filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Wong argued that his hearing did not comply with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The INS admitted that the hearing did not comply with the APA but argued that INS hearings did not have to comply with the APA because the statute authorizing deportation did not require a hearing or adjudication. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.