From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Wood v. Morbark Industries
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
70 F.3d 1201 (1995)
Ginger Wood (Ginger) was killed at work after being pulled into the chute of a woodchipper that he was operating. His widow, Ruby Wood (plaintiff), filed suit against the manufacturer of the woodchipper, Morbark Industries, Inc. (Morbark) (defendant). Wood alleged that the machine was defectively designed because the chute was unreasonably small at only 17 inches in length. After the accident, Morbark changed the design of the woodchipper by adding length to the chute. Pursuant to a pretrial motion in limine, the trial-court judge ruled that all evidence of Morbark’s subsequent remedial measure be excluded from evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 407. During opening statements, Morbark’s counsel suggested that the woodchipper was not defective because Ginger’s employer ordered several more after the accident. In addition, the president of Morbark testified that the 17-inch chute was the “safest length.” After Wood’s counsel attempted to reference the design change to controvert this testimony, the trial-court judge instructed the jury to disregard any mention of a design with a lengthened chute. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Morbark. Wood appealed, arguing that the trial court erred by not allowing Wood to reference the change in design to show feasibility once Morbark’s president’s testimony had put the issue into controversy.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Birch, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.