Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. Troutman Oil Co.
Arkansas Supreme Court
327 Ark. 448 (1997)

- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Lattermore Belcher (defendant) crashed his car into a tractor-trailer driven by an employee of Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. (defendant). The collision caused the tractor-trailer to crash into a gas station owned by Troutman Oil (plaintiff) and leased by Crosland (plaintiff). The building and its contents were essentially destroyed. Troutman Oil and Crosland sued Woodline and Belcher. During the trial, conflicting testimony was presented about whether the gas station building must be torn down, should be torn down, or should be repaired. As a result, the bids for repair or demolition and construction varied substantially. The value of the inventory in the store was presented through a hand-made list from Crosland, based on his belief of the value of each item. After the trial, the jury awarded Troutman $100,000 in property damage and $15,000 in lost profits. The jury awarded Crosland approximately $31,000 for property damage and $24,000 for lost profits. The trial court then held a hearing regarding prejudgment interest and awarded 6 percent interest per annum to both Crosland and Troutman Oil from the date of the crash. Belcher and Woodline appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.