Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. Troutman Oil Co.

327 Ark. 448 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. Troutman Oil Co.

Arkansas Supreme Court
327 Ark. 448 (1997)

JL

Facts

Lattermore Belcher (defendant) crashed his car into a tractor-trailer driven by an employee of Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. (defendant). The collision caused the tractor-trailer to crash into a gas station owned by Troutman Oil (plaintiff) and leased by Crosland (plaintiff). The building and its contents were essentially destroyed. Troutman Oil and Crosland sued Woodline and Belcher. During the trial, conflicting testimony was presented about whether the gas station building must be torn down, should be torn down, or should be repaired. As a result, the bids for repair or demolition and construction varied substantially. The value of the inventory in the store was presented through a hand-made list from Crosland, based on his belief of the value of each item. After the trial, the jury awarded Troutman $100,000 in property damage and $15,000 in lost profits. The jury awarded Crosland approximately $31,000 for property damage and $24,000 for lost profits. The trial court then held a hearing regarding prejudgment interest and awarded 6 percent interest per annum to both Crosland and Troutman Oil from the date of the crash. Belcher and Woodline appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership