Yaker v. France
United Nations Human Rights Committee
Communication No. 2747/2016 (2018)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
French law criminalized wearing clothing intended to conceal the face in public spaces, regardless of the form or reason for the clothing. The law expressly identified several exceptions, including clothing worn for health, professional, sporting, artistic, or festive reasons. Although the law, on its face, did not target religious practices, it was mostly enforced against Muslim women wearing niqabs, which were full-face veils. After Sonia Yaker (plaintiff) was convicted by a French court for wearing a niqab in public, she filed a complaint against France (defendant) with the United Nations Human Rights Committee (the committee). She claimed that her conviction violated her rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), specifically her rights to religious freedom under Article 18 and freedom from religious discrimination under Article 26. France argued that its ban did not violate Article 18 because (1) being able to facially identify persons in public was key to public safety and (2) being able to see others’ faces was an essential element of social life. The committee considered the parties’ arguments.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

