United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 55 (1982)
In 1980, the legislature of the state of Alaska established a program to apportion dividends of mineral income among state residents. The program based the amount that each resident would receive upon the number of years the individual had resided in the state dating back to the 1959 establishment of Alaska’s statehood. Zobel (plaintiff) had resided in Alaska since 1978. Zobel filed suit in state court asserting that the distribution of dividends based on length of residency violated the Equal Protection Clause and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The state supreme court validated the law. Zobel petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Brennan, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.