Superior Court of Pennsylvania
574 A.2d 1130 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1990)
Pamela Zummo (plaintiff) and David Zummo (defendant) were divorced and had three children. Pamela had primary physical custody of the children, and David had physical custody every other weekend. Pamela was Jewish, and David was Catholic. The children were raised Jewish, in accordance with an agreement Pamela and David made before getting married. However, upon the couple’s divorce, David did not want to take the children to Sunday School during the weekends he had physical custody of the children. Rather, David wanted to take the children to Catholic religious services. Pamela filed a complaint, seeking to compel David to take the children to Sunday School and prohibit David from taking the children to Catholic Mass. The trial court found in Pamela’s favor on both issues and entered an order to that effect. David appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kelly, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.