Burnette v. Carothers

192 F.3d 52 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Burnette v. Carothers

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
192 F.3d 52 (1999)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Marie G. Burnette and Ralph G. Burnette Jr. (plaintiffs) owned a home in the Rye Hill section of Somers, Connecticut. The Burnettes filed a complaint against Connecticut state officers (defendants), alleging that hazardous substances had emanated, and continued to emanate, from the Connecticut Correctional Institute (CCT), a state-run prison located north of Rye Hill. The Burnettes claimed that the toxic substances had polluted and continued to pollute their water wells. The Burnettes brought suit under the citizen-suit provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The district court dismissed all of the Burnettes’ claims and held that the state and its agents were immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. The Burnettes appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Winter, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership