From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Hanly v. Securities and Exchange Commission
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
415 F.2d 589 (1969)
Hanly (defendant) and several other brokers attempted to persuade potential investors to purchase stock in U.S. Sonics Corporation (Sonics). Sonics had been in business for several years, but had never had a profit, and several potential mergers with larger corporations had failed. Despite this, Hanly continued to enthusiastically recommend Sonics’ stock to potential investors. The Securities and Exchange Commission (plaintiff) brought an action against Hanly, alleging that he had a duty to inform investors about adverse information regarding Sonics and failed to do so. The Commission then barred Hanly and the other brokers from associating with any other brokers. Hanly appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.