Hertzberg v. Dignity Partners, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
191 F.3d 1076 (1999)
- Written by Rocco Sainato, JD
Facts
Dignity Partners, Inc. (defendant) was a corporation that would purchase the life insurance policies of AIDS patients, and then take on the premium payments for the policies. Upon the patients’ deaths, Dignity Partners would receive the proceeds from the policies. In order to raise capital, Dignity Partners had one stock offering. Shortly after the offering, a study was released indicating that AIDS patients were living much longer than they had several years earlier. Dignity incurred many losses as a result, since it was forced to pay the premiums on the life insurance policies for much longer than it had previously. Hertzberg (plaintiff), a Dignity Partners stockholder, brought suit against Dignity Partners for failing to disclose this fact in its registration statement. The district court ruled in favor of Dignity Partners, stating that Hertzberg did not have standing under Section 11 because Hertzberg had purchased Dignity Partners stock more than 25 days after it had been issued. Hertzberg then appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.