Matter of Whitcomb & Keller Mortgage Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
715 F.2d 375 (1983)
Whitcomb & Keller Mortgage Co. (W&K) (plaintiff) had a contract with Data-Link Systems, Inc. (Data-Link) (defendant) under which Data-Link provided essential computer services to W&K. When W&K filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on October 27, 1980, it owed Data-Link $12,954.63 for services rendered. Data-Link continued to provide services to W&K, which paid for them. W&K decided to sell certain assets that related to Data-Link’s work, and on February 26, 1981, the bankruptcy court approved the purchase bid of Unity Savings Association (Unity). On March 4, Data-Link stopped servicing W&K. W&K filed an action for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and the court ordered Data-Link to continue performing. On March 5, Data-Link counterclaimed, requesting either (1) a declaration that W&K had assumed its contract by receiving the contract’s benefits and seeking to enforce the contract or (2) an order requiring W&K to assume or reject the contract within a specified time period. The court took the matter under advisement. In the meantime, in early March, Data-Link refused to provide either W&K or Unity with certain information necessary for those parties to complete the sale. The court required Data-Link to cooperate. The parties stipulated that any interest Data-Link might have would attach to the sale proceeds. On April 8, the court ruled that W&K had not assumed the contract and that there was no reason to require assumption or rejection within a specified time period because Data-Link was being paid for all of its postpetition work and was otherwise adequately protected. That same day, W&K sought to reject the contract. The issue was set for trial. On April 24, the court confirmed W&K’s reorganization plan. Data-Link filed a proof of claim in which it asserted priority for its prepetition debt. After a trial in July, the court concluded that W&K was entitled to reject the contract and that Data-Link’s prepetition claim was not entitled to priority. The district court affirmed. Data-Link appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jameson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.