Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M

Matthews v. Matthews

725 S.W.2d 275 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matthews v. Matthews

Texas Court of Appeals
725 S.W.2d 275 (1986)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Jordan Matthews (defendant) and Carol Matthews (plaintiff) were married. They experienced months of extreme marital stress consisting of separation, reconciliation, and further separation. During this period, Jordan alleged that Carol was on drugs and stole assets from his company safe. Carol alleged that Jordan took their son, refused to let her speak to their son, and threatened to initiate custody litigation if she did not sign a partition agreement. Carol signed the agreement, which partitioned title to most of the community-property assets to Jordan in exchange for relieving Carol from any debts relating to those assets. Carol received no assets in the partition. Carol filed for divorce and a distribution of community-property assets. The trial court granted the divorce and found that the partition agreement was void because it was procured through duress. Jordan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bass, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law

Key Terms