McCulloch v. Maryland

4 L. Ed. 579, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCulloch v. Maryland

United States Supreme Court
4 L. Ed. 579, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819)

  • Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Play video

Facts

In 1790, Congress created the Bank of the United States (the bank), which existed until its charter expired in 1811. In 1816, Congress passed a new act reviving the bank’s existence, and the bank opened up a branch in the state of Maryland (plaintiff). The Maryland state legislature imposed a tax on all out-of-state banks operating in the state of Maryland. Although the tax was neutral on its surface, the bank was the only out-of-state bank in Maryland at the time, and it was the tax’s intended target. James McCulloch (defendant), the Maryland branch’s cashier, refused to pay the tax. Maryland sued McCulloch in state court, claiming that the Tenth Amendment and state sovereignty gave it an absolute right to tax anything within its borders. The trial court ruled for Maryland and ordered McCulloch to pay the tax. Maryland’s highest court affirmed. McCulloch petitioned for review in the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview