Neibaur v. Neibaur

142 Idaho 196, 125 P.2d 1072 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Neibaur v. Neibaur

Idaho Supreme Court
142 Idaho 196, 125 P.2d 1072 (2005)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Steve Neibaur (plaintiff) and Penny Neibaur (defendant) married in 1982. Approximately one year before the marriage, Steve had started Steve Neibaur Farms, Inc. (SNF), a farming operation. Steve was the sole shareholder and directed all operations. Penny had her own employment and did not work for SNF. During the marriage, SNF increased in value from roughly $146,000 to $1 million. Steve filed for divorce in 2001. At a trial before the magistrate, Penny argued that SNF was Steve’s alter ego and that the court should pierce the corporate veil to award her a share of SNF as community property. The magistrate held that SNF was Steve’s separate property but awarded the community $750,000 to reimburse the community for the labor Steve devoted to increasing SNF’s value. Steve appealed. The district court affirmed the magistrate’s order, but the appellate court reversed and vacated the magistrate’s award. Penny appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schroeder, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership