Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
V

Vanguard Production, Inc. v. Martin

894 F.2d 375 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vanguard Production, Inc. v. Martin

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
894 F.2d 375 (1990)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Vanguard Production, Inc. (Vanguard) (plaintiff) was negotiating for assignment of an oil-and-gas lease. Vanguard and lender Glenfed agreed that Glenfed would select the lawyers for the title and closing work and Vanguard would pay the fees. Glenfed chose the law firm Ames, Ashabranner, Taylor, Lawrence, Laudick and Morgan (Ames) (defendant). Ames partner David Morgan hired Billy Martin (defendants) to assist him. Martin had prepared a title opinion for a third-party warning that Texas Rose Petroleum (TRP) had sued the seller for damages involving the lease. Morgan and Martin advised Vanguard that TRP’s suit would not harm the title because its dismissal would cure any title defect. The TRP lawsuit was dismissed, and Morgan and Martin omitted mention of it in the opinion prepared for Glenfed. After the deal closed, TRP’s suit was refiled, and TRP’s claim to 75 percent of the lease was sustained. Vanguard sued Martin, Morgan, and Ames (the lawyers) for malpractice. The district court granted summary judgment to the lawyers, holding that the lawyers and Vanguard had no attorney-client relationship and therefore the lawyers owed no duty to Vanguard. Vanguard appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms