Wang v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2000] FCA 1599, (2000) 105 FCR 548 (2000)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Wang v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Australia Federal Court
[2000] FCA 1599, (2000) 105 FCR 548 (2000)

  • Written by Jamie Milne, JD

Facts

Chinese law limited religious practice to five state-recognized religions and required that religious adherents attend only state-registered churches. The registration requirement effectively allowed the Chinese government to monitor membership in religious organizations as well as meeting locations, clergy selection, publication of religious materials, and funding. Chinese citizen and resident Ji Dong Wang (plaintiff) was a Protestant Christian who attended an unregistered church. In 1995 and 1996, Wang was twice arrested by the Public Service Bureau (PSB) while attending a religious meeting. Each time, he was detained for several days, interrogated, and beaten. Between the detentions, Wang’s shop was broken into multiple times. Police refused to help because Wang was under investigation by the PSB. In 1997, the PSB confiscated bibles from Wang’s shop and threatened to arrest him if he continued distributing Bibles. Wang left China, entering Australia on a temporary visa. He subsequently applied for a more permanent protection visa. Wang argued that he was a refugee because he was unwilling to return to China due to a well-founded fear of persecution for practicing his religion at an unregistered church. An immigration officer denied the application. The Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) denied review, concluding that because Wang would be free to practice his religion at a registered church, any punishment for practicing his religion at an unregistered church would not amount to religious persecution but would instead merely constitute punishment for breaking Chinese law. After a trial court denied review, Wang appealed the RRT’s decision to the Federal Court of Australia.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Merkel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 949,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 949,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 949,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,400 briefs - keyed to 1,004 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,004 law school casebooks.

Case book preview