From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Williams v. Rank & Son Buick, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
170 N.W.2d 807 (1969)
Williams (plaintiff) was shopping for a used car with air conditioning. A salesman at Rank & Son Buick, Inc. (Rank) (defendant) showed Williams a car and told him it was air conditioned. Williams inspected the car and took it for an hour and a half test drive. Williams, an educated man who owned his own business, bought the car but subsequently discovered that the car did not have air conditioning. He brought suit against Rank, claiming fraud. The trial court ruled in favor of Williams. Rank appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hanley, J.)
Dissent (Wilkie, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.