Williams v. Williams
Nevada Supreme Court
97 P.3d 1124 (2004)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Richard Williams (plaintiff) and Marcie Williams (defendant) were married in a formal ceremony. At the time, Marcie was under the good-faith belief that she had been divorced from her previous husband, John Allmaras. However, no divorce decree was ever entered by a court to dissolve the marriage between Marcie and Allmaras. Richard filed suit against Marcie, seeking annulment of their marriage. Marcie filed a counterclaim, seeking one-half of their jointly held property and spousal support as a putative spouse. At trial, Richard testified that Marcie knew or should have known that she was not divorced from Allmaras. Marcie testified that she believed she was no longer married to Allmaras and was able to marry again, based on Allmaras’s statements that there had been a divorce. At the close of evidence, the trial court found that Marcie was entitled to one-half of their jointly held property and spousal support. Richard appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.