Williams v. Williams

29 Ariz. 538, 243 P. 402 (1926)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. Williams

Arizona Supreme Court
29 Ariz. 538, 243 P. 402 (1926)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Mattie Williams (plaintiff) and John Williams (defendant) entered into a prenuptial agreement prior to their marriage that stated that, in the event of divorce, John would pay Mattie $500 dollars in full satisfaction and settlement of all claims Mattie might have against John or his property. Mattie subsequently filed for a fault-based divorce on the grounds of John’s willful desertion and cruelty. Mattie sought spousal support and an equitable distribution of community property. John challenged, arguing that, pursuant to the prenuptial agreement, Mattie was only entitled to receive $500 in full settlement of all claims, including claims for spousal support and equitable distribution. It was undisputed that the prenuptial agreement had been executed voluntarily and without fraud or undue influence. The trial court granted the divorce, holding that the prenuptial agreement was void as contrary to public policy, and awarded Mattie $100 in monthly spousal support. John appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lockwood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership