Williams v. Williams

720 S.W.2d 246 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Williams v. Williams

Texas Court of Appeals
720 S.W.2d 246 (1986)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Linda Williams (defendant) and Louis Williams (plaintiff) were married. On the day before the wedding, Louis drove Linda to a bank parking lot and presented her with a premarital agreement to sign. Louis stated that the agreement was to help secure his separate property in order to protect his children from a prior marriage. The agreement identified Linda’s and Louis’s separate properties, and it stated that incomes from these properties would remain separate properties during the marriage. Linda said that she did not want to sign the agreement. However, she signed it because 20 guests were scheduled to attend the wedding the next day. Linda was very educated, had substantial experience in business and with contracts, and worked for a bank. After the parties separated, Louis tried to enforce the premarital agreement. The trial court held that the agreement was valid. Linda appealed, arguing she was coerced into signing it.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cannon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership