Wissink v. Wissink
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York
749 N.Y.S.2d 550 (2002)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
David Wissink (defendant) and Jane Wissink (plaintiff) were married and had a teenage daughter named Andrea. Jane filed a petition for custody of Andrea. David had a clear, documented history of domestic violence against Jane. Andrea witnessed the abuse at times. Other than the abuse, however, David was a good parent to Andrea and never physically harmed her. At trial, Andrea denied that David physically abused Jane. Andrea stated that she did not have a good relationship with Jane and that she preferred to live with David. The trial court ordered a mental-health evaluation of Andrea. The evaluation consisted of two 45-minute interviews conducted by a social worker. The social worker concluded that Andrea had a better relationship with and preferred to live with David. The trial court awarded custody of Andrea to David. Jane appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.