Z and Others v. United Kingdom

34 Eur. H.R. Rep. 3 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Z and Others v. United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights
34 Eur. H.R. Rep. 3 (2002)

Facts

Four siblings (plaintiffs) suffered severe neglect and abuse at the hands of their parents. Relatives, teachers, and others filed numerous reports with social services, but social services did not take any steps to protect the siblings. Five years later, the siblings’ mother told social services that she could no longer cope with the siblings. Social services then took custody of the siblings. The siblings filed a complaint in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), alleging that the failure of the government of the United Kingdom (government) (defendant) to protect the siblings violated Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (convention). The ECtHR heard the expert testimony of a psychiatrist who testified that social services improperly delayed action, resulting in serious psychological trauma in at least three of the siblings. It was undisputed that the neglect and abuse of the children qualified as inhuman and degrading treatment under the convention.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership