Lawrence v. Texas

539 U.S. 558 (2003)

From our private database of 47,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lawrence v. Texas

United States Supreme Court
539 U.S. 558 (2003)

  • Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Play video

Facts

Police officers were dispatched to the apartment of John Lawrence (defendant) in response to a report of a weapons disturbance. When the officers entered the apartment, they observed Lawrence and Tyron Garner (defendant) engaged in a sexual act. Lawrence and Garner were charged with violating a Texas statute that criminalized sodomy between persons of the same sex. After Lawrence and Garner were convicted by a justice of the peace, they exercised their right to a new trial in criminal court. Lawrence and Garner argued that the Texas statute violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The criminal court rejected that argument, and Lawrence and Garner entered pleas of nolo contendere. A Texas appellate court considered the statute’s intersection with both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause but ultimately deemed the statute constitutional and affirmed the convictions. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

Dissent (Thomas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 964,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,500 briefs - keyed to 1,006 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

Case book preview