Washington v. Glucksberg
United States Supreme Court
521 U.S. 702, 117 S. Ct. 2258, 138 L. Ed. 2d 772 (1997)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Harold Glucksberg (plaintiff) was a doctor who practiced medicine in the State of Washington (defendant). Under state law, it was a crime to knowingly cause or aid another person to attempt suicide. Glucksberg frequently treated terminally ill patients and claimed he would have assisted those patients in ending their lives if not for Washington’s law. Glucksberg sued the state to invalidate the law. Glucksberg argued that (1) the liberty interests protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution included a fundamental right to die and (2) this right to die included a right to assisted suicide. Glucksberg contended that because the Washington law denied this fundamental right, it was unconstitutional. The district court ruled that the law was unconstitutional. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Souter, J.)
Concurrence (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
