Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Bundt v. Embro

Supreme Court of New York, Queens County
265 N.Y.S.2d 872 (1965)


Facts

Five passengers (plaintiffs) in one or the other of two cars involved in a crash brought suit for their injuries against the owners of the cars, the drivers of the cars, and a construction worker who had negligently blocked a stop sign on the road (defendants). During the suit, the passengers were awarded a judgment for the same injuries against the State of New York, which was determined to be negligent. The defendants moved to amend their answers and assert that judgment as a defense.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Groat, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.