Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Banks v. Elks Club Pride of Tennessee 1102

Tennessee Supreme Court
301 S.W.3d 214 (2010)


Facts

Alice Banks (plaintiff) was seated at an Elks Lodge social, hosted by Elks Club Pride of Tennessee 1102 (defendant) when her chair collapsed, seriously injuring her back. Dr. Robert Boyce (defendant), a physician at Premier Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, P.C. (Premier Orthopaedics) (defendant), recommended that Banks undergo surgery involving fusing her vertebrae at the L3–L4 and L4–L5 levels. Banks agreed, and Boyce performed the surgery. After he had completed the surgery, Boyce found that he had inadvertently fused Banks’s L2–L3 and L3–L4 vertebrae. Boyce operated again the following day to correct his mistake. After her surgeries, Banks recuperated at Cumberland Manor Nursing Home (Cumberland). While at Cumberland, Banks developed a staphylococcus infection that required her to undergo further surgeries and medical treatment. Banks sued the Elks Club Pride of Tennessee 1102, Boyce, and Premier Orthopaedics. The defendants moved to amend their answers to raise the affirmative defense of Cumberland’s comparative fault. Banks opposed the defendants’ motions, arguing that the common law’s original-tortfeasor doctrine imputed liability for Banks’s subsequent injuries to the defendants. The trial court ruled against the defendants’ motions. The defendants applied for an interlocutory appeal, which the court of appeals denied. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Koch, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.