Cox v. Pearl Investment Co.
Colorado Supreme Court
450 P.2d 60 (1969)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Mrs. Cox (plaintiff) fell and was injured on a property owned by Pearl Investment Co. (Pearl) (defendant). Subsequently, the tenant of the property, Goodwill Industries paid Cox $2,500 in a settlement in exchange for a signed document entitled “Covenant Not to Proceed with Suit” (Covenant). The Covenant contained a clause reserving Cox the right to sue anyone else for damages arising out of the accident. Based on a precedent set in Price v. Baker (1959), the trial court ignored the clause and granted summary judgment to Pearl, holding that Cox’s recovery from Goodwill Industries released Pearl from liability. Cox appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hodges, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.