Search thousands of law cases & case briefs
47,500 case briefs
Lookup case briefs from some of the top law school casebooks.
Get more out of case briefs. Sign up for a free trial to get rule of law explanations, holdings and reasonings, and questions and answers submitted by our online community.
Explore Quimbee’s pricing plans- O'Neill v. United States
50 F.3d 677 (1995)
- O'Neill v. Williams
527 A.2d 322 (1987)
- O'Neil v. Picillo
883 F.2d 176 (1989)
- O'Neil v. Schuckardt
733 P.2d 693 (1986)
- O'Neil v. Wal-Mart
502 Fed. Supp. 2d 318 (2007)
- Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc.
135 S. Ct. 1591 (2015)
- Öneryildiz v. Turkey
App. No. 48939/99, ECHR 2004-XII, (2005) 41 Eur. Ct. H.R. 20 (2004)
- O.N.E. Shipping Ltd. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.
830 F.2d 449 (1987)
- One Wisconsin Institute, Inc. v. Thomsen
490 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (2020)
- One World One Family Now v. Miami Beach
175 F.3d 1282 (1999)
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Bronson Trustees
315 Or. 149, 843 P.2d 890 (1992)
- Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser
2011 S.C.C. 20 (2011)
- Ontario Deciduous Fruit Growers' Association v. Cutting Fruit Packing Co.
66 P. 28 (1901)
- Ontario Public Service Employees Union Pension Trust Fund v. Nortel Networks Corp.
369 F.3d 27 (2004)
- Ontel Products Corp. (Pink Armor Nail Gel)
NAD Case No. 5701 (2014)
- On the Case of Radilla Pacheco and Others
Case No. 912, Case No. 2010
- ONY, Inc. v. Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc.
720 F.3d 490 (2013)
- OOIDA v. Department of Transportation
724 F.3d 230 (2013)
- Opdyke v. Kent Liquor Mart, Inc.
181 A.2d 579 (1962)
- Operaciones Tecnicas Marinas S.A.S. v. Diversified Marine Services, LLC
913 F. Supp. 2d 254 (2012)
- Opera Company of Boston, Inc. v. Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing ArtsThis case brief has an associated case brief video.
817 F.2d 1094 (1987)
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Carpenter
4 Nev. 534 (1869)
- Ophthalmic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Paychex, Inc.This case brief has an associated case brief video.
632 F.3d 31 (2011)
- Opinion of Attorney General Bradford
1795
- Opinion of Attorney General Randolph
1792
- Opinion of Attorney General Speed
1865
- Opinion of Attorney General Wirt
1821
- Opinion of the German Bundesgerichtshof in the Matter of E. Gu. (Defendant) v. K. B. (Plaintiff)
BGHZ 41 151 (1964)
- Opinion of the German Federal Constitutional Court
47 N.J.W. 36 (1994)
- Opinion of the German Federal Constitutional Court Concerning the Constitutional Complaints of Two Trustees in Bankruptcy
Second Panel, October 18, 1983 (1983)
- Opinion of the German Federal Labor Court
43 N.J.W. 141 (1990)
- Opinion of the German Reichsgericht in the Matter of G., Defendant-Appellant v. St., Plaintiff-Respondent
RGZ 103 82 (1921)
- Opinion of the German Reichsgericht in the Matter of G., Plaintiff-Appellant v. F., Defendant-Respondent
RGZ 142 70 (1933)
- Opinion of the German Reichsgericht in the Matter of S. S. v. M. E. Corp.
2d Civil Division January 22, 1935, RGZ 146, 385 (1935)
- Opinion of the German Reichsgericht in the Matter of Suedd. Transp. Vers. A..G., Plaintiff-Appellant v. W., Defendant-Respondent
RGZ 106 386 (1923)
- Opinion of the Justices (Public Use of Coastal Beaches)
139 N.H. 82, 649 A.2d 604 (1994)
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate
764 N.E.2d 343 (2002)
- Opinion of the Swiss Federal Court in the Matter of Dr. Haass, Defendant-Appellant v. Leopold Wyler, Plaintiff-Respondent
BGE 41 II 474 (1915)
- Opinion of the Swiss Federal Court in the Matter of Rogenmoser Against Tiefengrund A.G.
BGE 59 II 372 (1933)
- Opinion of the Swiss Federal Court in the Matter of Weber, Huber, et Cie., Defendant-Appellant, Against “Rimba,” Plaintiff-Respondent
BGE 57 II 528 (1931)
- Opinion on the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary
Opinion 720/2013 (2013)
- Opinions of the Justices to the Senate
440 Mass. 1201, 802 N.E.2d 565 (2004)
- Oplchenski v. Parfums Givenchy, Inc.
254 F.R.D. 489 (2008)
- Oposa v. Factoran
No. 101083, 224 S.C.R.A. 792 (1993)
- Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.This case brief has an associated case brief video.
86 N.Y.2d 685 (1995)
- Oppenheimer Fund v. Sanders
437 U.S. 340, 98 S.Ct. 2380 (1978)
- Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.
301 U.S. 206 (1937)
- Oppenheimer v. Ministers of Interior and of Health
HCJ 295/65, 20(1) PD 309 (1966)
- Oppenheim v. Kridel
140 N.E. 227 (1923)
- Optopics Laboratories Corporation v. Savannah Bank of Nigeria, Limited
816 F. Supp. 898 (1993)
- Opuku-Boateng v. State of California
95 F.3d 1461 (1996)
- Opus 3 Ltd. v. Heritage Park, Inc.
91 F.3d 625 (1996)
- Opuz v. Turkey
App. No. 33401/02 (2009)
- Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.This case brief has an associated case brief video.
750 F.3d 1339 (2014)
- Oramulu v. Washington Mutual Bank
699 F. Supp. 2d 898 (2009)
- Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.This case brief has an associated case brief video.
59 A.D.2d 110 (1977)
- Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Philwold Estates, Inc.This case brief has an associated case brief video.
418 N.E.2d 1310 (1981)
- Orantes-Hernandez v. Thornburg
919 F.2d 549 (1990)
- Orascom Telecom Holdings SAE v. Republic of Chad, La Société des Télécommunications du Tchad and N.A. Citibank N.A. and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development European Investment Bank
[2008] EWHC 1841 (QB) (2008)
- Orban v. Field
1997 WL 153831 (1997)