Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
750 F.3d 1339 (2014)


Facts

Oracle America, Incorporated (Oracle) (plaintiff) developed a computer-programming platform called Java. In addition to the programming language, the Java software provided pre-developed code to accomplish common tasks consistently across programs. The pre-developed code was grouped into packages. Each package contained a set of methods, organized into classes, that would instruct the program to accomplish a certain task based on the method identified. Computer programmers became accustomed to using Java’s designations at the package, class, and method level. After negotiations fell through to license Java for use in developing software programs for its Android mobile devices, Google, Incorporated (Google) (defendant) created its own Java-based programming platform. Google’s platform used a mix of Java’s pre-developed packages and packages developed by Google’s own programmers. Oracle sued Google for copyright infringement based on the 37 Java packages that Google copied from Oracle’s platform. Google admitted to copying the packages to enable software developers to continue using designations with which the developers were already familiar. The district court found that none of Oracle’s Java packages were entitled to copyright protection and that Google therefore did not infringe. Oracle appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Malley, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.