Oppenheimer v. Harriman National Bank & Trust Co.
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 206 (1937)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
In 1930 Henry Oppenheimer (plaintiff) was induced to purchase shares of stock in Harriman National Bank & Trust Co. (the bank) (defendant) based on fraudulent statements made by the bank’s president and vice president. In March 1933, after experiencing financial difficulties, the bank closed. In May 1933, Oppenheimer filed a lawsuit in federal district court against the bank, seeking to rescind his stock purchase. During the litigation, the bank was declared insolvent, and a receiver was appointed. The district court ruled in favor of the bank. The court of appeals reversed, holding in favor of Oppenheimer and ordering the bank to pay damages to Oppenheimer after the bank paid the claims made by its unsecured creditors at the time the bank became insolvent. Oppenheimer appealed, arguing that his judgment should be ranked with the bank’s other unsecured creditors.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.