Opinion of the German Bundesgerichtshof in the Matter of E. Gu. (Defendant) v. K. B. (Plaintiff)
Germany Federal Court of Justice
BGHZ 41 151 (1964)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
E. Gu. (EG) (defendant) stored household goods in KB’s (plaintiff) warehouse. EG fell behind on paying storage fees, and KB sued EG for the balance due. EG counterclaimed, asserting that some of his stored goods had been damaged and other goods stolen. KB’s standard-form storage contract contained a standardized clause that KB was liable for loss of or damage to goods stored only if KB or its agents were at fault. The burden of proof was on the bailor—the party storing the goods—to show that the bailee—the warehouse owner or its agents—was at fault. Germany’s commercial code placed the burden of proof on the bailee in all cases in which property was lost or damaged. The appellate court found in favor of KB on its storage-fees claim and dismissed EG’s counterclaim. EG appealed to the Germany Federal Court of Justice—the highest court in Germany.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,600 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.