Oppenheimer v. Ministers of Interior and of Health

HCJ 295/65, 20(1) PD 309 (1966)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oppenheimer v. Ministers of Interior and of Health

Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 295/65, 20(1) PD 309 (1966)

Facts

Oppenheimer and seven other petitioners (plaintiffs) filed a petition with the Israel Supreme Court, alleging that Israel’s ministers of the interior and of health (defendants) had failed to enact regulations under the Law for Prevention of Nuisances. The law prohibited anyone from causing “substantial or unreasonable” noise, odor, or pollution, and it directed the ministers of the interior and of health to promulgate regulations concerning potential violations of this law. Specifically, the law said that the ministers of the interior and of health “shall promulgate” regulations regarding nuisances. Each of the petitioners complained that he was being subjected to some sort of noise or odor nuisance, and each claimed that the lack of regulations made it difficult or impossible to enforce the law. The ministers argued that they were empowered, but not required, to enact regulations under the law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Silberg, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership