Oppenheimer v. Ministers of Interior and of Health
Israel Supreme Court
HCJ 295/65, 20(1) PD 309 (1966)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Oppenheimer and seven other petitioners (plaintiffs) filed a petition with the Israel Supreme Court, alleging that Israel’s ministers of the interior and of health (defendants) had failed to enact regulations under the Law for Prevention of Nuisances. The law prohibited anyone from causing “substantial or unreasonable” noise, odor, or pollution, and it directed the ministers of the interior and of health to promulgate regulations concerning potential violations of this law. Specifically, the law said that the ministers of the interior and of health “shall promulgate” regulations regarding nuisances. Each of the petitioners complained that he was being subjected to some sort of noise or odor nuisance, and each claimed that the lack of regulations made it difficult or impossible to enforce the law. The ministers argued that they were empowered, but not required, to enact regulations under the law.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Silberg, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.