Opinion of the German Federal Constitutional Court Concerning the Constitutional Complaints of Two Trustees in Bankruptcy
Germany Federal Constitutional Court
Second Panel, October 18, 1983 (1983)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
Two bankruptcy trustees (plaintiffs) faced a difficult question about how to treat claims for severance pay in a bankruptcy case. Corporate laws provided no guidance, but bankruptcy law prioritized employees for wages earned within the previous year. Severance pay was not wages earned within the previous year, so severance pay was placed sixth in priority classes in all other claims. However, the lead labor court, Bundesarbeitsgericht (BAG), applying current social policy and a constitutional provision stating that Germany was a democratic and social state, held that severance pay must be given priority even ahead of wages. Courts subsequently followed the BAG decision despite the conflict with codified bankruptcy law. The trustees sought the interpretation of the Germany Federal Constitutional Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.