Play video

Philosophical Views of the Judiciary’s Role and Common Interpretive Problems

Learn about differing philosophical views of the judiciary’s role and how those views affect statutory interpretation.

Transcript

I. Introduction

Statutes have become the primary building blocks of the modern American legal system. Some legal scholars call this phenomenon the statutorification of American law. But political processes and legislative compromises often result in statutes that are ambiguous, broadly worded, or otherwise unclear. Twentieth-century Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter defined a statute as, quote, “an instrument of government partaking of its practical purposes, but also of its infirmities...

Lessons

1. Welcome
  • Welcome
2. Federal Systems of Legislation & Regulation
  • The Federal Constitutional System of Legislation and Regulation
  • Overview of Sources of Federal Law
  • The Constitution and Legislative Power
3. Federal Legislative Processes
  • How a Bill Becomes a Law
  • Delegation of Congressional Lawmaking Power to Agencies I
  • Delegation of Congressional Lawmaking and Judicial Power to Agencies II
4. Statutory Interpretation
  • Philosophical Views of the Judiciary’s Role and Common Interpretive Problems
  • Differing Theories of Statutory Interpretation
  • Legislative History and its Use in Interpreting Statutes
  • Canons of Statutory Interpretation I
  • Canons of Statutory Interpretation II
  • Canons of Statutory Interpretation III
  • Canons of Statutory Interpretation IV
5. Agency Action, State Processes, & Courts
  • The History and Evolution of the Administrative State
  • Federal Regulatory Processes
  • Executive Branch Control of Agencies and Judicial Review of Agency Action
  • Judicial Review of Agency Action Under the APA
  • State Legislative & Administrative Processes
  • Judicial Process