Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Erikson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
13 F.3d 1061 (1994)


Facts

In 1981, Karen Erickson (plaintiff) helped establish Trinity Theatre, Inc. (Trinity) (defendant) and maintained several positions there until 1991. During her time at Trinity, Erickson completed two plays, Prairie Voices and Much Ado About Shakespeare (Much Ado). Erickson completed a third play, Time Machine, a project Erickson produced independently of her positions with Trinity. While developing Prairie Voices and Much Ado, Erickson conducted improvisational idea sessions with Trinity’s actors. While suggestions by some of the actors were adopted into the completed scripts, Erickson retained final control over what material was chosen. For Time Machine, Erickson collaborated with Paddy Lynn, who was initially identified as co-author of the script and received royalties from performances. Erickson later denied that Lynn was ever intended to be a joint author of Time Machine. In 1988, Erickson and Trinity reached an agreement under which Trinity would pay royalties to Erickson for performances of the plays. Trinity stopped paying royalties to Erickson in 1990. After obtaining copyright registration for the three plays, Erickson asked Trinity to cease all performances, but Trinity refused. Erickson responded with a copyright-infringement suit, and the district court affirmed the decision of a magistrate judge to enjoin Trinity from performing Erickson’s plays. Trinity appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.