From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Guaranty State Bank & Trust Co. v. Van Diest Supply Company
Kansas Court of Appeals
55 P.3d 357 (2002)
Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company (Guaranty) (plaintiff) provided several loans to Barnard Grain Company (Barnard). On May 24, 1994, Guaranty filed a financing statement, perfecting a security interest in collateral, including all of Barnard’s inventory “now and hereafter owned.” Van Diest Supply Company (Van Diest) (defendant) made a loan to Barnard and in January 1998 filed a financing statement covering “all of debtor’s property . . . purchased or otherwise acquired from Secured Party; all cash and non-cash proceeds arising from or received upon the sale.” While the phrase was never explicitly used, Van Diest was apparently attempting to create a purchase-money security interest. Van Diest did not send separate notification of its security interest to Guaranty. After Barnard began selling off assets in late 1999, Van Diest removed 536.5 gallons of chemicals from Barnard’s facility in February 2000. Barnard neither objected or consented. Van Diest later sent Barnard a refund check because it had inadvertently taken too much of the chemicals. Guaranty filed suit against Van Diest, alleging that it had priority in the chemicals and that Van Diest had committed a conversion, asserting control over the property of Guaranty. Van Diest filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Van Diest had a purchase-money security interest that took priority over Guaranty’s interest. Guaranty filed its own motion for summary judgment and argued that Van Diest had failed to provide written notification to Guaranty despite its competing security interest. The district court granted Guaranty’s motion and found that Van Diest lacked priority and had committed a conversion of the chemicals. Van Diest appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Beier, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 620,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 620,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.