Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

People v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Illinois
708 N.E.2d 1212 (Ill.App. 1999)


Facts

Howard (defendant) was charged with stealing Alfred Rosenbloom’s wallet at gunpoint near the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) campus. At trial, the prosecution called Steven Melamed who testified that Howard had previously stolen his wallet near the UIC campus. The prosecution argued that the Melamed robbery was similar enough to the Rosenbloom robbery to establish Howard’s modus operandi of robberies. Specifically, the prosecution argued that: (1) both robberies were of white male college professors, (2) both robberies occurred on or near the same street next to the UIC campus, and (3) in both robberies the robber came up from behind the victim carrying a gun. Howard claimed that someone else had committed the robberies, and that he was home at the time they were committed. The trial court held that the robberies were sufficiently similar and allowed Melamed’s testimony to help establish Howard’s modus operandi for purposes of identification. Howard was convicted of the Rosenbloom robbery. Howard appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Zwick, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Quinn, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 204,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.